Processes and systemd

The term systemd refers to one of the most important and controversial pieces of software in Linux. Though if you weren't tuned in to less mainstream Linux distributions, you wouldn't know just how controversial it is. What does systemd do? Well, in a sense, everything.

The D in systemd is for daemon. Don't be confused, a daemon is just a process running in the background. Something that silently runs to keep the system going. Systemd is a manager for these daemons, but it also doubles as being process number 1, or the process needed to start the system. Older daemon managers did not have these features, nor did older versions of process number 1 (aka init) have the functionality to do quite literally everything.

The controversy with systemd comes with the idea that it bloated and does way too much. It handles logins, networking, daemons, booting, scheduling tasks, devices, and logs for daemon processes. Some claim that it creates a wide attack area because a vulnerability in any one of these areas could gain you control to any of these areas, others are angry because systemd sometimes uses it's config files to manage other config files.

One of the things that I had a rather rude awakening to recently for instance, was that on older systems you can use ifconfig to configure network interface addresses. You can even set flags to make them static like ifconfig wlan0 192.168.1.234 netmask 255.255.255.0. This code will cause weird behavior now because the address isn't being set within systemd, so some parts of the system think that you have one ip address, while others think it is configured for another (usually the default, which is DHCP in most cases). I could not find why I could not assign static hosting forever. Low and behold, one day I look at the interface configuration files associated with systemd and notice that it still says DHCP. But ifconfig said that the address was different. That's why none of my network tests worked.

Now, if I'm used to configs being done one way, I get being upset at them changing. But in some ways, this is also progress. If everything is together, it's more usable (though it's also more vulnerable). But, the cool thing about Linux is there are several distributions that have not adopted systemd. They are, not coincidentally, some of the harder to use ones.