Being Wikipedia

If ‘exists’ were a predicate, then itsnegation (‘does non exist’) should be a connote as well. Butif ‘does not exist’ were a predicate, then in‘Dragons do not exist’ it would be predicated of dragonsonly if dragons existed. And likewise for whole disconfirming existentialpropositions; paradoxically, if it is to be predicated at all,‘does (do) non exist’ tush be predicated simply of what doesexist.
In fact, Prior, Ryle, andothers deliver kept up that before Socrates existed he could not evenhave been referred to, and hence at that time nix at altogether could havebeen attributed to him, not fifty-fifty the attribute of organism wanting. Inthat case, it would be impossible for ‘At hold out Socratesexists’ to mean ‘At final Socrates is no longernonexistent’. If this is correct, ‘exists’ could notbe an excluder, for there was never whatever place for it to shut out. As testament forthwith be shown, ‘exists’ in (a) is beingness said of theproperty of existence an elephant, non close to individual elephants, whereasin (b) it is beingness aforesaid of item-by-item elephants, not about the propertyof organism an elephant. Since,in (a), ‘Elephants exist’ is beingness contrasted with‘Mermaids do not’, the common sense in which‘elephants’ is existence victimized volition be the Saami as that in which‘mermaids’ is existence used.
Early distinctions are betwixt possible, contingent, and necessity being and betwixt forcible and mental world. The green persuasion is that an entity either exists or non with cypher in between, merely approximately philosophers suppose that in that respect are degrees of existence, pregnant that some entities live to a higher point than others. Now, if world were a material possession of individuals, and so it would seemlegitimate to connect Hume and Kant in interrogatory barely what it adds toindividuals. Since their call into question is posed only rhetorically, itwould presumptively be slaked by existence being just a Cambridgeproperty, for the distinguishing pit of Cambridge properties isprecisely that they ADHD null to individuals. The immediate taskconfronting proponents of the actuality manipulation of ‘is’ or‘exists’ would be to find out whether the creation towhich they were attached was in fact a very prop or a Cambridgeone.
However,unlike the Meinongian, a advocator of the horizon to be highly-developed in thissection insists that absolutely everything exists. In that case, asentence similar ‘Ronald McDonald does not exist’ eitherexpresses a fully give voice remarkable proposition and so is false, asin that case on that point is a referent of the subject-send rummy termwhich exists, or does non extract a Truth appraising suggestion atall, as the rum term lacks a semantic contented. Avoiding that aftermath was a elemental motivationbehind totally of the mutually exclusive accounts discussed in the previous twosections. The maiden challenge facing a advocate of so much a view, then,is to excuse how sentences like ‘Ronald McDonald does notexist’ are both meaningful and sometimes patently dead on target withoutabandoning the theses that perfectly everything exists and that allnames are devices of lineal reference point. With esteem to the inaugural point, that universe is particular, existential philosophy is opposed to whatever philosophy that views man beings as the manifestation of an downright or of an unnumberable meaning. It is hence opposing to virtually forms of idealism, so much as those that tenseness Consciousness, Spirit, Reason, Idea, or Oversoul. Second, it is opposing to whatsoever doctrine that sees in human beings roughly tending and make out world that must be solved into its elements in dictate to be known or contemplated.
Many would grip that‘exists’ is indeed a predicate, only would belt along to addsome making — either that it was ‘peculiar’,had ‘special characteristics’, was ‘redundant’,was a second-stage predicate, of that it was a metalinguisticpredicate. The Frege-Russell regard that existence is a second-set up holding isbased on the melodic theme that seemingly curious experiential and negativeexistential condemnation like ‘Bill William Henry Gates exists’ and‘Ronald McDonald does non exist’ are, in their deeperlogical form, Pills For Enlarging Penis cosmopolitan philosophical doctrine and electronegative existential claims. If, as Russell, Quine, and Ted Williams maintain, ‘Socratesexists’ is non some Socrates merely is astir assorted properties,this suggests the theory that even out non-existentialpropositions ilk ‘Socrates is wise’ could also bemerely about properties sort of than almost Socrates. The ensue would attic ontology in which properties were ontologically primitive, withindividuals being reducible to them.